Christopher Heyman vs Antoine Bellier Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W L W L L
Form
W L L W L L L W L LHead-2-Head: Heyman 3 - 0 Bellier
They have played 8 sets in total, with Heyman winning 6 and Bellier winning 2. The last match between Heyman and Bellier was at the M15 Sarreguemines, 28-10-2020, First, Carpet with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(6).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Christopher Heyman | 3 |
| Antoine Bellier | 0 |
M15 Sarreguemines(28-10-2020)
6
7
6
4
7
6
| Heyman | Stats | Bellier |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 812 | Ranking | 715 |
| 258 | Highest Rank | 168 |
| 31 | Age | 28 |
| L | Plays | L |
| 19 | Titles | 6 |
| 64% (352-201) | Career Total W/L | 54% (319-270) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $76,560 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Monteiro VS Quinn PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Christopher Heyman
Player
Antoine Bellier
75%
(
87 of
116)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
11
Aces
19
1
Double Faults
5
84%
(
73 of
87)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
55 of
74)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
26%
(
30 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
34 of
115)
120
Total Points Won
111
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Antoine Bellier
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 47 | Games Won | 35 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:15:40 | Average Match Time | 1:15:40 |
| 76% (127/167) | 1st Serve % | 64% (103/160) |
| 80% (102/127) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (70/103) |
| 53% (21/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (35/57) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/9) |
| 34% (55/160) | Return Points Win % | 26% (44/167) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Christopher Heyman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Olivier Rojas
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christopher Heyman
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Antoine Bellier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Antoine Bellier
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
15
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
93%
(
43 of
46)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
12 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Antoine Bellier
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
7
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
35 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Matej Vocel
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
21
Aces
19
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
90%
(
46 of
51)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
31 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
20 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Antoine Bellier
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve %
45%
(
10 of
22)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
9 of
9)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
100%
(
7 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
22
Total Points Won
16
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Antoine Bellier
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Antoine Bellier
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Espen Lagarde
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Antoine Bellier
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
6
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Antoine Bellier
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
10
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Omni Kumar
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
128)
16
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
7
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
35 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
49 of
128)
125
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (352/201) | Win/Loss | 54% (319/270) |
| 60% (767/502) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (708/623) |
| 55% (6451/5370) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6629/6251) |
| 66% (113/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (160/109) |
| 61% (154/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (68/69) |
| 65% (85/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (78/82) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 1139 | Aces Total | 3361 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 887 | Total Double Faults | 1486 |
| 1:18:55 | Average Match Time | 1:17:3 |
| 548.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 511.27 |
| 69% (19517/28466) | 1st Serve % | 64% (21111/32990) |
| 68% (13201/19517) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (15375/21111) |
| 52% (4639/8949) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6023/11879) |
| 46% (1323/2869) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1064/2773) |
| 41% (11509/28052) | Return Points Win % | 36% (12027/33234) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (13/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (26/39) | Challenger W/L | 49% (71/75) |
| 67% (326/162) | Futures W/L | 57% (234/173) |
| 64% (343/540) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (310/576) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 51% (86/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (120/219) |
| 60% (99/166) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (82/160) |
| 89% (339/301) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (315/272) |
| 11% (339/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (315/42) |
| 24% (214/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (272/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
